RAS PhysiologyСенсорные системы Sensory Systems

  • ISSN (Print) 0235-0092
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5936

Modern approaches to cochlear implantation in inner ear anomalies: audiological aspects

PII
S0235009225010018-1
DOI
10.31857/S0235009225010018
Publication type
Review
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 39 / Issue number 1
Pages
3-13
Abstract
Indications for cochlear implantation are constantly expanding, going beyond severe and complete hearing loss, including patients with unilateral deafness and, recently, with congenital inner ear malformations (Karamert et al., 2022). Among congenital cases of sensorineural hearing loss, inner ear malformations (IEM) account for approximately 20% of cases, with up to 35% of them meeting the criteria for cochlear implantation (Sennaroglu et al., 2017). Due to the wider use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the temporal bone, the population of cochlear implant (CI) recipients among patients with IEM is also expanding, which naturally requires a retrospective assessment of clinical outcomes. At the same time, it is certainly important to evaluate not only the surgical results, which characterize, first of all, the safety of CI in this subgroup of patients, but also audiological outcomes: the degree of restoration of speech and auditory perception, without which it is impossible to get a complete picture of the effectiveness of cochlear implantation. Given the diverse anatomy of the cochlea in IEM, when planning cochlear implantation, determining of the electrode subtype, length and depth of its insertion, as well as the choice between CI or auditory brainstem implantation is of paramount importance not only for the success of the surgical intervention itself, but also for the results of subsequent auditory and speech rehabilitation. The purpose of this review is to analyze actual data about the audiological results assessment of cochlear implantation in patients with congenital IEM compared to patients with normal cochlear anatomy. We tried to identify IEM, in which CI gives the best results, as well as those malformations that require careful planning of surgery, specific selection of the electrode, as well as prevention of possible perioperative complications.
Keywords
кохлеарная имплантация аномалии внутреннего уха выбор электродной решетки
Date of publication
14.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
12

References

  1. 1. Дайхес Н.А., Диаб Х.М., Корвяков В.С., Кондратчиков Д.С., Пащинина О.А., Коробкин А.С., Куян Ю.С., Панина О.С., Михалевич А.Е., Юсифов К.Д., Шамшутдинов Т.М. Классификация аномалий внутреннего уха. REJR. 2018. Т. 8(3). С. 8–19. DOI:10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-3-8-19.
  2. 2. Зеликович Е.И., Торопчина Л.В., Куриленков Г.В. Синдром расширенного водопровода преддверия: этиология, клиника, диагностика, реабилитация пациентов. Вестник оториноларингологии. 2015. Т. 80(6). С. 46-50. Doi: 10.17116/otorino201580646-50.
  3. 3. Левин С.В., Левина Е.А., Кузовков В.Е., Королева И.В., Дворянчиков В.В. Алгоритм отбора пациентов на кохлеарную имплантацию. Лекция для врачей. Consilium Medicum. 2023. Т. 25(3). С.198-203. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2023.3.202108.
  4. 4. Янов Ю.К., Кузовков В.Е., Клячко Д.С., Радионова Ю.О. Влияние этиологии сенсоневральной тугоухости на реабилитацию детей после кохлеарной имплантации. Рос. оториноларингология. 2015. Т. 2(75). С.100-106.
  5. 5. Agarwal S., Prakash A., Grover M. HRCT temporal bone in pretreatment planning of cochlear implant candidates. Comparison of Sennaroglu classification versus the new SMS classification of cochleovestibular malformations. ECR 2020. Scientific Exhibit. C-11241. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.26044/ecr2020/C-11241.
  6. 6. Al-Mahboob A., Alhabib S.F., Abdelsamad Y., Alzhrani F. Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. V. 279(1). P. 37-48. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06884-5.
  7. 7. Celik M., Karatas E., Kanlikama M. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with and without inner ear malformations. Pak J Med Sci. 2018. V. 34(2). P. 380-384.
  8. 8. Choi B.Y., An Y.H., Song J.J., Koo J.W., Lee J.H., Oh S.H., et al. Clinical observations and molecular variables of patients with hearing loss and incomplete partition type III. Laryngoscope. 2016. V. 126(3). P. 123-128.
  9. 9. Coudert A., Vigier S., Scalabre A., Hermann R., Ayari-Khalfallah S., Truy E. Analysis of inner ear malformations associated with a facial nerve anomaly in 653 children fitted with a cochlear implant. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019. T. 44(1). P. 96–101. Daneshi A., Farhadi M., Ajalloueyan M., Rajati M., Hashemi S.B., Ghasemi M.M., Emamdjomeh H., Asghari A., Mohseni M. Mohebbi S., Hosseinzadeh F., Mirsalehi M. Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformation: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May. V. 132:109901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109901. Dhanasingh A., Jolly C. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs. Hear Res. 2017. V. 356. P. 93–103.
  10. 10. Farhood Z., Nguyen S.A., Miller S.C., Holcomb M.A., Meyer T.A., Rizk H.G. Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017. V. 156(5). P. 783–793.
  11. 11. Grover M., Sharma S., Preetam C. et al. New SMS classification of cochleovestibular malformation and its impact on decision-making. J Laryngol Otol. 2019. V. 133(5). P. 368-375.
  12. 12. Isaiah A/, Lee D., Lenes-Voit F., Sweeney M., Kutz W., Isaacson B., et al. Clinical outcomes following cochlear implantation in children with inner ear anomalies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. V. 93. P. 1-6.
  13. 13. Karamert R., Tutar H., Altinyay S. et al. Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Considerations Related to Surgical Complications and Communication Skills. 2022. V. 84(3). P. 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517562.
  14. 14. Kim L-S., Jeong S.W. Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and/or Inner Ear Malformations. In: Kaga K., editor. Cochlear Implantation in Children with Inner Ear Malformation and Cochlear Nerve Deficiency. Singapore: Springer Singapore. 2017. P. 87-95.
  15. 15. Melo A.S., Martins J., Silva J., Quadros J., Paiva A. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017. V. 44(5). P. 509-516.
  16. 16. Minami S.B., Yamamoto N., Hosoya M., Enomoto C., Kato H., Kaga K. Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Inner Ear Malformation: A Novel and Simple Grading, Intracochlear EABR, and Outcomes of Hearing. Otol Neurotol. 2021. V. 42(2). P. 117-123.
  17. 17. Naples J.G., Ruckenstein M.J. Cochlear Implant. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Feb. V. 53(1). P. 87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.09.004.
  18. 18. Ozkan H.B., Cicek Cinar B., Yucel E., Sennaroglu G., Sennaroglu L. Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Malformations Before and After Cochlear Implantation: A Cohort Study of 274 Patients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2021. V. 46(1). P. 154-160.
  19. 19. Parent V., Codet M., Aubry K., Bordure P., Bozorg-Grayeli A., Deguine O., et al. The French Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Cochlear implantation complications. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020. V. 137 Suppl 1. P. 37-43.
  20. 20. Patel N.D., Ascha M.S., Manzoor N.F., Gupta A., Semaan M., Megerian C., et al. Morphology and cochlear implantation in enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018. V. 39(6). P. 657-663.
  21. 21. Qi S., Kong Y., Xu T., Dong R., Lv J., Wang X., et al. Speech development in young children with Mondini dysplasia who had undergone cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. V. 116. P. 118-124.
  22. 22. Ronner E., Basonbul R., Bhakta R., Mankarious L., Lee D.J., Cohen M.S. Impact of cochlear abnormalities on hearing outcomes for children with cochlear implants. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020. V. 41(2):102372.
  23. 23. Sennaroğlu L., Bajin M.D. Classification and Current Management of Inner Ear Malformations. Balkan Med J. 2017. V. 34. P. 397-411. Doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0367.
  24. 24. Sennaroglu L., Saatci I. A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope. 2002. V. 112(12). P. 2230-2241.
  25. 25. Shah S., Walters R., Langlie J., Davies C., Finberg A., Tuset M.P., Ebode D., Mittal R., Eshraghi A.A. Systematic review of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations. PLOS one. 2022 Oct 21. V. 17(10):0275543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275543.
  26. 26. Tay S.Y., Anicete R., Tan K.H. A Ten-Year Review of Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Abnormalities after Cochlear Implantation in Singapore. Int J Otolaryngol. 2019 Dec 1:2019:6483714. doi: 10.1155/2019/6483714.
  27. 27. Vincenti V., Di Lella F., Falcioni M., Negri M., Zanetti D. Cochlear implantation in children with CHARGE syndrome: a report of eight cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. V. 275(8). P. 1987-1993.
  28. 28. Zhang L., Qiu J., Qin F., Zhong M., Shah G. Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with common cavity deformity; a retrospective study. J Otol. 2017. V. 12(3). P. 138-142.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library